A Tory England


Quote of the cuts day has to go to Shadow Chancellor Alan Johnson, to Nick Clegg in the Commons directly after the Chancellor’s cuts package was announced:

Somewhere between the ballot box and your ministerial car door opening, you changed your mind on everything.

This particular brand of Conservatism is interesting. It is of course very Thatcherite. It is no different to what it was in the 1980s. Actually it is different because it is far more severe. It can easily be dressed up in lovely new inclusive phrases like ‘The Big Society’ and ‘Progressive Conservatism’ despite the fact that in less than ten seconds, the Chancellor can announce 490,000 expected job losses in the public sector, whilst his backbenches cheer gleefully. It’s easy to call it fair and necessary. But when, along with half a million job losses, we hear the Chancellor say:

“The Employment and Support Allowance, given to people unable to work due to sickness or disability, will be restricted to one year”

… it is virtually impossible for anyone who has even a fundamental understanding of the word ‘fair’ to be able to justify the madness.

Yesterday’s spending review was ideological. It does not matter how many times Cameron says it isn’t, it is. It will devastate lives. £1bn is being saved by 2013 by cutting Child Benefit, yet £2bn is being given away to companies earning £350,000 a year, also by 2013. Most Conservatives are in politics for this very reason; to role back the Welfare State for the poorer and instead enlarge the Welfare State for their friends in business. When 490,000 people are instantly made unemployed, and the entire Conservative benches in Parliament stand up smiling and screaming, their faces beaming uncontrollably, waving their Parliamentary papers in the air with overwhelming joy; one finds it difficult to accept their rhetoric that this is ‘tough’ on them. It seems this is their moment in the spotlight. They were supremely happy yesterday. They have spent years hoping this moment would come.

It has been a successful attack by the Tories and they have, I will admit, been amazing at getting their side of events across and gaining mass support for their plans. They have achieved this, as far as I can tell, in four ways:

1) Absolutely 100% blame Labour for everything.
It is clear that the Coalition has been told to mention the debt left by Labour as much as possible. It is perfect justification. Every Minister interviewed will refer to Labour’s legacy within about five seconds of being questioned. It is largely illogical because the debt left by Labour was firstly, very much needed, and secondly, is not actually dire.
The problem with this view is that up until recession hit, the Tories pledged to back Labour’s spending pound for pound. So, by suggesting that Labour spent thirteen years on a spending spree, the Tories backed it fully. Then when the banks collapsed, and people’s homes and lives were put at risk, spending rose to keep people safe. This had to happen to offset the problems suddenly caused by huge unemployment. This isn’t the State’s fault. It isn’t the Government’s fault. Spending had to rise. What use is it cutting unemployment benefit during a time when unemployment is at an all time high? That is Tory logic. Allow the recession to run its course. Allow people to lose their homes and their jobs and to worry about how they are going to feed their kids. So next time when you complain about Labour’s debt, actually consider why we are in debt.

2) Make sure the faults of the Private Sector are ignored.
It was the financial sector that failed miserably. They risked everyone’s savings to enrich themselves further. But it isn’t just the banks that messed up. Since the early 1980s wages for workers have stagnated. They have hardly risen at all on average. Yet, the wages of the very wealthy; the owners, have increased ten fold. Take Sir Philip Green, the new Tory Party investigator of Civil Service pay; he owns a company called Taveta investments, which is registered in his wife’s name who happens to live in a tax haven. He has successfully avoided paying tax worth up to £285mn. At the same time, he awarded himself £1.2bn in a single year personally, whilst telling his work force (the people who actually make that money for him) that they must now increase contributions to their final pension scheme by half and work up to five years longer to receive it. He also uses sweatshops in India. BUT WE’RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. Now, you can only sustain unjustifiably large wages, like that of Mr Green if profit remains high. If your workers are being squeezed as much as possible, and have less disposable income to spend consuming and so enriching the very few, how do you do that? The solution was easy. You offer them easy credit, like a Topman Store Card. They then pay more than they usually would but over a longer period of time. Thus, the little man is squeezed further, but the guy at the top makes more. But apparently this is perfectly fine. The Public Sector, the sector that bailed out the Financial sector, is apparently entirely to blame.

The problem as I see it, is that surplus profit was not being recapitalised in beneficial causes. Instead of expanding and looking into new forms of production, the owners of capital were buying up assets on the stock market. When this is amplified by million and millions of people, we suddenly have a problem. You buy assets on the stock market, hoping you will get a pretty handsome return in the future. But you understand that might not happen. You are gambling. The City of London and New York recklessly gambled our money away, they are entirely to blame.

Whilst David Cameron likes to suggest that National debt is like household debt; he’s wrong. Not only is household debt nothing like National debt (I can’t suddenly raise taxes, if i go into the red, nor can I print my own money), but this neoliberal experiment, that the Tories kick started in the 1980s, actively encouraged us all to get into debt. This is why the banking sector collapsed. Because debt was encouraged. Secondly, personal debt is not always a bad thing if it helps improve the future. I am in debt, to pay for my education, which I hope will allow me to get a better job and be able to provide a better life for my future family, than I would had I gone straight into a job I did not want to do. This debt is an investment. Public debt is also an investment, especially if it keeps as many people in their homes and jobs as possible; which Labour understood (bare in mind, I am not a Labour voter), and which the Lib Dems understood before they were offered a bit of power. Public debt is not always a bad thing. It is often needed. It provides investment and a safety net.

The Tories, with help from their friends in the Media (Conservative Director of Communications: Andy Coulson, used to be editor of News of the World) have shaped political discourse in this country to an apathetic and largely moronic population, beautifully. The Sun (owned by Murdoch, who also owns News of the World) ran a double page spread last Monday entitled “Britain’s benefit blackspots”. A guide to the worst areas of Britain for benefit fraud. Altogether, they noted that Benefit cheating costs the UK taxpayer £900mn. You may think that is a lot. But according to research by the TUC and Tax Research UK, Corporate Tax avoidance, and personal tax evasion (i.e – Lord Ashcroft and his non-dom status) costs the UK taxpayer close to £25bn. That’s about 30 times more in lost revenue. Enough to wipe out the deficit in about eight years, without the need for a mass of public service cuts.

It is also suggested that public service workers are over paid. Now, given that wages have stagnated for most workers in the Private sector, i’d suggest that this is the fault of the Private sector. These bastards should pay more, not attack the public sector.

The Tories ran the 2010 campaign on the idea that a rise in National Insurance was an evil ‘tax on jobs’. Today, they just killed off 50,000 jobs in 20 seconds. But, it’s the public sector, so apparently it’s okay. The massive consequences on communities and small private businesses, will become apparent very soon. The Tories will try to claim it is all Labour’s fault. It isn’t.

The public sector, furthermore, is not inflated. Public spending during the 1960s was far higher than at any time during the 00s. Wages were rising beautifully during the 1960s too.

3) Make sure the public believes, whether true or not, that this is the only way.
The cuts that have been made, did not have to be so severe. They are overly harsh. We are a Triple A credit Country. 80% of our debt matures in 14 years, not a couple of years. We have the 5th largest economy in the World still. And we have the 3rd largest currency reserve in the World. And a very strong currency actually. So whilst you may believe everything the Tories tell you about how awful Labour were; it suggests to me that if the Tories were in power when recession struck, they’d have offered no help, spent absolutely no extra to keep people in homes and jobs, and then most probably blamed Unions.

The current debt in the UK stands at 64% of GDP. After World War II, it was 180%. More than double now. Japan has a debt of 194%. The USA has a debt close to 73% of GDP. In fact, between 1920 and 1960, for that forty or so year period, UK government debt did not fall below 100%.

4) Gain support from sources that apparently are credible.
George Osbourne yesterday listed the people who agreed with him. We’ll take them one by one now. Firstly, he listed the IMF. The IMF is a neoliberal organisation that only ever proscribes harsh economic treatment to solve problems. They destroyed Ghana beyond recognition. Malaysia refused to accept anything the IMF demanded, and now Malaysia is doing just great. The IMF can also be blamed for half fucking up Ireland. Last week the IMF said that bank regulations were failing – We all fucking knew that two years ago. Nice of them to join us. Great source George. Secondly, he mentioned the CBI – the Confederation of British Industry. The business owners union. The same people who told us all that introducing minimum wage would destroy business in Britain. The same people who suggested that students are a drain on society, and yet they all went to university when it was free. They are businesses, looking to enrich themselves further, they have no sense of social responsibility, nor do they care if you cannot afford to eat. They would like to see no Welfare State and the NHS privatised. The CBI attempted to justify a huge amount of Corporate tax avoidance (discussed earlier) with….

Legitimate tax planning – undertaken by companies that operate globally – should not be confused with so-called tax avoidance

Thirdly, he mentioned the Bank of England. The institution responsible for the welfare of the economy. The institution that failed to see the biggest financial crises ever from taking place, even though that is its specific job. The same institution whose Deputy Governor Sir John Gieve admitted that they knew that the financial sector was out of control, and had no idea what to do about it. Another great choice for a source.
And lastly, he mentioned the 35 businessmen who signed a letter and sent it to the press advocating everything they are doing. These businessmen are not economists. They do not know how to run an economy. They are under the impression that a business haven is ideal for all of us. Contrary to that opinion, i’d say otherwise. Nevertheless, they signed the letter. Who are these businesses? Well, one of them is Paul Walsh of Diageo, who I shall mention shortly. He has been given a role as an advisor to David Cameron. Vested interest number 1. Another is Nick Prest, Chairman of AVEVA. AVEVA has just been awarded a contract to supply Babcocks, who are to build the two new aircraft carriers unveiled by the Tories. Vested interest 2. Another, is John Nelson of Hammerson Investors. Massive tax avoiders, and are quite happy to even tell us that’s what they do, on their website. Perhaps I will refuse to pay any tax ever again and refer to it as ‘tax efficient’. Vested interest 3. Another is Moni Varma, Chairman of Veetee who admitted that Conservative HQ asked him to sign the letter. Not a vested interest, but an idiot nonetheless. Another is Philip Dilley, Chairman of Arup, who has just been given a place as an advisor to David Cameron. Vested interest 4
The letter itself was drawn up by Next Chief Exec. Lord Wolfson. Wolfson has donated close to £300,000 to the Tory Party and is now a Tory Lord. Vested interest 5. Another is Sir Christopher Gent, non-executive chairman of GlaxoSmithKline. Gent has donated around £113,000 to the Tory Party. Vested interest 5. Isn’t it amazing? Why are we taking them seriously? Why aren’t their vested interests mentioned? I think I will email my logic Tory MP and let you know what his response is.
Next, David Cameron has created a sort of business council. This includes Paul Walsh; the CEO of Diageo PLC, who has moved ownership of British alcohol brands offshore to avoid tax. Martin Sorrell, whose company WPP has moved entirely offshore to avoid tax. And CEO of Glaxosmithkline, Andrew Witty who avoids paying million in tax due to offshore accounting.
None of these sources are credible. None have the Country’s best interest at heart. None care if a few hundred thousand lose their jobs, and their homes. This is Tory bullshit.

It has been a very clever four pronged attack to win support for a program that would usually take months and years to thrash out the details of. The proposal yesterday was horrific. It is not Progressive or fair in any way. The Liberal Democrats should be utterly ashamed. They are finished. Out of protest, I will not vote in favour of AV, even though I once would.

At the moment, the public is suffering from political apathy. They assume this is all necessary. It isn’t. It is dangerous and it is a complete attack on a decent, caring Nation in an attempt to turn us all into bitches of the business World. Labour are not all that much difference, hence the lack of credible opposition. They are not progressives. By moving to the centre, and even the centre-right, they have backed themselves into a corner. They no longer represent the Progressives. Their needs to be vast civil action. Unions need to step up, students need to step up, everyone needs to step up and let these people know that we should no longer be controlled or live in a society entirely shaped by a very select few old grey rich businessmen. I hold out hope and I have faith in this generation of anti-Tory opposition.

Advertisements

10 Responses to A Tory England

  1. Black Flag says:

    Futile,

    it is virtually impossible for anyone who has even a fundamental understanding of the word ‘fair’ to be able to justify the madness.

    Madness??

    For you, it is fair to steal from someone and give it to someone else!

    That’s the common problem with Western mindset:

    Thou shalt not steal, except by popular vote

    …and thus, the collapse of Western society.

    Theft is simply unsustainable in civilization.

    It will devastate lives.

    Yes, sadly, it will.

    But these people were lied to by those who claimed that they could obtain goods by other people stealing it for them.

    They believed it. They cheered it. The want it to continue.

    But it cannot. And those that bet their families on theft of goods from other will suffer.

    The solution is not to return to the thievery.

    The solution is to stop the thieving and the deceit.

    to role back the Welfare State for the poorer and instead enlarge the Welfare State for their friends in business.

    And you promote the rollback of largess to business and enlarge the welfare for those who do not earn it.

    But what you do not see is that it is the same thing with the same devastation.

    Stealing and giving to another is not justified by who receives the stolen goods – it is all theft and it is all evil, no matter who steals and who receives the loot.

    The answer is to stop stealing, not change the recipient list!

    But you will not support that, for you believe you benefit when your name is on that list.

  2. We don’t consider it stealing, we don’t consider it threatening. We quite like the system. We don’t mind paying taxes. We are not market fundamentalists. We quite like our social system. We quite like knowing that there is a safety net, should be fall. I know you are going to comment on every blog I ever write attempting to insist that we’re all abused victims with a gun to our face, but we don’t have a problem with it. I know you’re going to try to make me feel like any time I need to use the NHS, or police service, I am stealing someone elses money, but I don’t buy it. I find your view horrific actually. You sensationalise, and whilst your arguments are very clever, they run entirely at odds with what I consider fair (I know you think my definition of fair is evil, I am happy to accept that), it’s ridiculous.

    And even if taxation IS theft as you call it; so what? It is the lesser of two evils.

    It is not evil 🙂 And no I will not support your stance. I find it despicable and abhorrent. You are a market fundamentalist who appears to believe the market solves all problems ever. And evidence contrary to your view, you cleverly try to tie to government. It couldn’t possibly be a flaw in your ideology. I cannot accept this.

    “Stealing and giving to another is not justified by who receives the stolen goods”
    – If a child is starving, and you’re standing there with food, I would have no problem taking it from you immediately, and giving it to the child. I couldn’t give two fucks if you think it’s evil. For me, social spending is a sign of a decent, compassionate system. Every time you write, I am so proud that we don’t like in a World like the one you advocate.

    I do wonder though, if there was no tax at all, would every road be private? Would I have to pay a different person, just to drive on each road? Would I be allowed to breathe oxygen? Or is that too communist? My grandparents are currently in hospital, very very ill, what if we couldn’t afford to pay for healthcare? Because before I was a student, when I was working full time, I was perfectly happy for my taxes to go to help fund our NHS, even if I didn’t use it that year. I also recognise that I used a free school system, got to school on free roads, and when I got ill I could get better on a free NHS, which means there is a public framework that has allowed me to get to where I am. To then say “Omg taxes are evil” even though i’ve used tax money to get to the place I am at now, would be ridiculous. What would happen if I needed the police or fire department? Would I have to prove I could pay for their support, if my house is burning down? What if I lose everything (with your market system, there are many losers, if there are to be many winners)? No help whatsoever? What if I have had a fucking awful beginning to life? Abused, and psychologically messed up? Should I just forget my problems and start a business? What if I have a disabled child? What if I can’t afford private care because my disabled child needs constant support and help along with specialist education? Should I just hope that the market brings the costs down to a level I can afford, otherwise, fuck it my child can just suffer? What about schools? What if I have just lost my business, and absolutely everything, what do I do about my kids going to school? How do I feed my kids tomorrow? What if i’ve just lost everything, am a single parent, with two disabled kids, both need constant help, and now the house is on fire? Do I need to ring my fire insurance company whilst calling the private disability nurse, but obviously I now don’t have a job, so I can’t use the phone because the bill will be too high, nor can I drive them to the private hospital because I can’t afford paying for every road I use, all whilst the house burns down? Perhaps it would be easier for your market haven, and less of a burden, and far less evil, if I just let the kids burn? What do I do then? Do you take the “Not my fucking problem” view? Because if you do, I’d suggest that’s far more evil, on a far larger scale, and far more abhorrent and sickening, than a social system.

    Wealth is a product of society, a social system has allowed it to flourish. Even if you are of the opinion that wealth creation is entirely individual, you cannot deny that social spending has allowed you (maybe it educated your parents to the level they are at now, maybe a council house somewhere down the line allowed your family to save the money that helped you eventually, even if very subtly) to get to where you are. There is no such thing as individual wealth creation. By not paying back into a system that has allowed you to get where you are, is theft. You do not have absolute property right over any natural resource. The moment you claim you do, you are stealing.

  3. Black Flag says:

    Futile,

    We don’t consider it stealing,

    I know your gang of thieves do not consider theft as stealing – that would ruin your self-image of being “righteous”.

    But it is stealing – even if you rationalize it away – you are taking from someone else what you did not earn.

    Whether you do it yourself, or get a brute gang to do it for you – it is theft and evil.

    we don’t consider it threatening.

    Of course you don’t – because you are doing the threatening and have the goons!

    We quite like the system. We don’t mind paying taxes.

    I am not surprised!

    You believe you get more under a system of stealing then earning!

    What you do not factor is the cost on your children. You are not future-oriented.
    You hold a ego-centric world view.

    “Goods for me, costs for you”

    We are not market fundamentalists.

    No doubt! Which is why when disaster slams you in the face, you get all angry and surprised at its harshness!

    I know you are going to comment on every blog I ever write attempting to insist that we’re all abused victims with a gun to our face but we don’t have a problem with it.

    Let’s be clear – there is no “we”.

    There is you and your ilk who have no problem with it.

    Your victims feel otherwise.

    they run entirely at odds with what I consider fair

    Fair is subjective to the person. What appears fair to you probably does not appear that to someone else.

    Thus, basing your action that creates real consequences based on subjective attitude that cannot be claimed to be universal is a recipe for personal disaster.

    “Stealing and giving to another is not justified by who receives the stolen goods”
    – If a child is starving, and you’re standing there with food, I would have no problem taking it from you immediately, and giving it to the child.

    Of course you would have no problem, because you are blind.

    But you now have caused my family to starve and what Right do you have to overrule my Right to fulfill your perverted rationalization?

    I couldn’t give two fucks if you think it’s evil.

    I know that. You do not see the harm and violence you cause around you – as long as your ego is satisfied – to hell with the Rights of other People.

    The greatest evil done by man to man exists in your rationalizations.

    For me, social spending is a sign of a decent, compassionate system.

    You cannot claim compassion when you steal. It is called theft.

    To cause suffering on innocent others to relieve the suffering of the Universe on others increases suffering and does not solve it.

    Every time you write, I am so proud that we don’t like in a World like the one you advocate.

    You have no right to be proud.

    You are not charitable. Charity comes from voluntarily giving away what you have earn.</i.

    You advocate theft – and that is never a charity, and most certainly nothing to be proud of.

    I do wonder though, if there was no tax at all, would every road be private?

    The roads were private before government took them over.

    Would I have to pay a different person, just to drive on each road?

    You pay a different person depending on what grocery store you shop at, or shoe store, and such. Is this concept so over the top for you? Do you struggle in understanding this when you see many different shoe stores?

    Would I be allowed to breathe oxygen?

    Air is not an economic good. It is not an economic good because it does not exhibit a necessary condition called “scarcity”.

    Thus, breathing air does not create an economic condition.

    Whether you are “allowed” or not depends on your crime. Hanging -a typical government response to resistance- will most certainly cause you to not get air.

    Or is that too communist?

    Air is not communal. It is not an economic good, for it is not economically scarce.

    Air in a scuba tank is an economic good. It is scarce. You breathing out of scuba tank most certainly limits my breathing out of the same tank – so ownership of the tank becomes important so to determine who gets to use it.

    My grandparents are currently in hospital, very very ill, what if we couldn’t afford to pay for healthcare?

    People who can’t afford a car need to walk. Having to walk does not justify them stealing a car.

    It is prudent to save some of your earnings so to pay for things such as illness.

    Because you have been lied to, and because you agree to the lie, and because you support lying, your grandparents may suffer. Perhaps the lying and thievery may support their care.

    But know this truthit will cost you and your children your future.

    You have bet that you do not have to pay for what you consume.

    That bet can never win. It will be paid – if not by your grandparents, by you and if not by you, your children.

    But it will be paid – and harshly.

    Because before I was a student, when I was working full time, I was perfectly happy for my taxes to go to help fund our NHS, even if I didn’t use it that year.

    Then I’m happy you paid.

    But I do not want to pay for what I do not want – and therefore, what Right do you have to steal it from me anyway?

    I also recognise that I used a free school system, got to school on free roads, and when I got ill I could get better on a free NHS, which means there is a public framework that has allowed me to get to where I am.

    And thus, the extreme ignorance.

    There is no such thing as free.

    Somebody paid. True, maybe it wasn’t you at that time, but somebody paid.

    And the consequence: those that pay and do not benefit will resist and avoid payments.

    Thus, your economic problem.

    One party believes that others should pay for them.
    The other party will not pay for what does not benefit them.

    One party will use violence to steal it.
    The other party will simply stop producing.

    Consequences: Systemic economic collapse.

    To then say “Omg taxes are evil” even though i’ve used tax money to get to the place I am at now, would be ridiculous.

    The benefactors of theft rarely complain about theft.

    What would happen if I needed the police or fire department?

    Police and Fire were are all privately provided before government took it over.

    You are like the Communist Russians after the fall. They asked “Where do we get milk, if government does not give it to us?”

    They were shocked that they got milk.

    Would I have to prove I could pay for their support, if my house is burning down?

    Ever hear of a computer database?

    What if I lose everything (with your market system, there are many losers, if there are to be many winners)?

    Freedom is not a zero-sum game. Me being free does not make you a slave.
    Me earning wealth does not prevent you from earning.
    Me growing a garden to feed me does not prevent you from growing a garden to feed yourself.

    But, your political economic system IS a zero sum game.

    For you to steal means someone else must lose that good.
    You stealing my carrots gets you carrots, at my loss.

    You justify your theft by claiming “you had too many carrots” – but what Right do you have to determine that for me. They are not your carrots, thus you have no Right to them.

    This is your danger. You do not see the damage you wreck upon society – as I pointed out, you have an ego-centric world view – it is from YOUR view that you judge OTHERS, without caring about THEIR view about themselves.

    No help whatsoever?

    Help? Lots! But forcing me to pay for you is slavery, not help

    What if I have had a fucking awful beginning to life?

    Sorry, not my fault.
    We all have our own crosses to bear.

    Demand compensation from God or the Universe. Maybe “it” will listen.

    Abused, and psychologically messed up?

    Go after those that inflicted your suffering – but stealing from me to solve what the Universe or others have done is as evil as those that harmed you

    You do not solve suffering by causing suffering.

    What about schools?

    Gee, you must wonder how Newton learned to read?

    What if I have just lost my business, and absolutely everything, what do I do about my kids going to school?

    We homeschool our child. It’s a lot of fun.

    How do I feed my kids tomorrow?

    Earn it. Go get a job.

    Do you take the “Not my fucking problem” view?

    God has given me my own set of problems for me to solve.

    How about I solve my problems and you solve your problems.

  4. hells says:

    great piece of writing ,

    Were all in this together

    what total bollocks

  5. Excellent blog Jamie. It worries me that this is what I’m moving over to.

  6. Black Flag says:

    You need not worry, if you are not a thief.

    If you earn, you will do fine.

    If you advocate stealing and depend on it, you will probably not do so well.

  7. Black Flag says:

    Futile,

    Then you will create great hardship and suffering upon you and your children.

    As long as you are aware and accept that, so be it.

  8. I am glad we have come to a conclusion on this.

  9. Black Flag says:

    Futile,

    That has always been the conclusion of any political action.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: